1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 950 A.2d
  5. 950 A.2d 205 (2008)
 

ROSEN v. SMITH BARNEY, INC.

No. A-49 September Term 2007.

950 A.2d 205 (2008)

195 N.J. 423

Melvin ROSEN and James D. Fox, on Behalf of Themselves and all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Richard Siracusa, Plaintiff, v. SMITH BARNEY, INC., Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. and Salomon Brothers, Inc., Defendants-Respondents, and John Does 1-1000, inclusive, Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 25, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce H. Nagel, Roseland, argued the cause for appellants (Nagel Rice, attorneys).

Robert J. Del Tufo argued the cause for respondents (Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the thorough and persuasive Appellate Division majority opinion authored by Judge Lihotz. See Rosen v. Smith Barney, Inc., 393 N.J.Super. 578, 925 A.2d 32 (App.Div.2007). We add only the following comments by way of further explanation for our decision to affirm, in which we focus only on the issues raised in the dissent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases