OMR CORPORATION v. BAUER

No. ED 90541.

266 S.W.3d 887 (2008)

OMR CORPORATION, Respondent, v. Timothy BAUER & Catherine Bauer, Appellants.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

October 28, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy Bauer, St. Louis, MO, pro se.

Catherine Bauer, St. Louis, MO, pro se.

Emily E. Kahn, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant tenants, Timothy and Catherine Bauer, appeal pro se the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in favor of the plaintiff landlord, OMR Corporation. Because the tenants' claims are not preserved for our review, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases