FULFILLMENT SERVICES v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE

Nos. 06-15970, 07-15006.

528 F.3d 614 (2008)

FULFILLMENT SERVICES INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. (UPS-Parent); United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS-NY); and United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS-OH), Defendants-Appellees. Fulfillment Services Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS-Parent); United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS-NY); and United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS-OH), Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed June 9, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul D. Cullen, Sr., The Cullen Law Firm, Washington, DC, for the plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee.

Gregory B. Koltun, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendants-appellees-cross-appellants.

Before: BARRY G. SILVERMAN, M. MARGARET McKEOWN, and RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.


McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

The Interstate Commerce Act ("ICA") was adopted to bring uniformity to shipping regulations previously governed by inconsistent state laws. George W. Wright, Slouching Toward a Morass: The Case For Preserving Complete Carmack Pre-emption, 1 DePaul Bus. & Com. L.J. 177 (2003). Historically, the Interstate Commerce Commission had responsibility for enforcing the ICA. Continuing the deregulation initiatives begun in the 1970s and early...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases