ARREOLA v. CHOUDRY

No. 07-2696.

533 F.3d 601 (2008)

Gilbert R. ARREOLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mohammed CHOUDRY, M.D., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided July 14, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laura D. Cullison (argued), Carl Tullson, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Karen L. Kendall, Craig L. Unrath, Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, Peoria, IL, Dominick L. Lanzito, Querrey & Harrow, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Paul A. Castiglione (argued), Office of the Cook County State's Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Salvador A Godinez.

Before BAUER, WOOD and EVANS, Circuit Judges.


BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Gilbert Arreola brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that prison doctor Mohammed Choudry's treatment of his injured ankle constituted a deliberate indifference to a medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Following a two-day trial, a jury found in favor of Dr. Choudry. Arreola moved for a new trial, arguing that conversations between his lawyer and various jury members...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases