Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant argues that his plea allocution was factually insufficient to establish the crimes of robbery in the second degree under indictment No. 739A-06. However, as the defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing he has not preserved for appellate review the issue of the sufficiency of the plea allocution (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Toxey,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.