Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in limiting the defense counsel's cross-examination of the complainant as to prior bad acts because counsel failed to establish a good-faith basis for this inquiry (see People v Olibencia,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.