1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 188 P.3d
  5. 188 P.3d 900 (2008)
 

HIGHLANDS DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. CITY OF BOISE

No. 33174.

188 P.3d 900 (2008)

HIGHLANDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF BOISE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, October 2007 Term.

June 18, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davison, Copple, Copple & Cox, Boise, for appellant. Jay Gustavsen argued.

Boise City Attorney's Office, Boise, for respondent. Amanda C. Horton argued.

EISMANN, Chief Justice.

Highlands Development Corporation asked the City of Boise to annex two parcels of real property. The City did so, but gave the parcels a different zoning classification than the Corporation desired. It sought judicial review of the City's actions. The district court held that it had no authority to vacate the annexation and that the Corporation must apply for a rezone and submit a development proposal before it could challenge the zoning classification...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases