1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 175 P.3d
  5. 175 P.3d 910 (2008)
 

PANKOPF v. PETERSON

No. 46090.

175 P.3d 910 (2008)

Tory PANKOPF and Patricia Pankopf, Appellants, v. Michael PETERSON, a/k/a Mike Peterson; and Home Planners, LLC, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

February 7, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tory M. Pankopf, Reno, for Appellants.

Richard G. Hill, Reno, for Respondents.

BEFORE GIBBONS, C.J., CHERRY and SAITTA, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal, we consider whether an action against a residential designer based on alleged mistakes in his plans drawn to construct a personal residence is subject to the procedural requirements set forth in the provisions of NRS Chapter 40 that pertain to constructional defect actions. We hold that the provisions of NRS Chapter 40 do not apply in this case.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Appellants Tory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases