IN RE STADSVOLD

No. A06-1696.

754 N.W.2d 323 (2008)

In re the Matter of the Decision of County of Otter Tail Board of Adjustment to Deny a Variance to Cyril STADSVOLD and Cynara Stadsvold.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Rehearing Denied August 1, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan L. Seeger, Nathan L. Seeger Law Office, Fergus Falls, MN, for Appellant.

Michael T. Rengel Pemberton, Sorlie, Rufer & Kershner, P.L.L.P., Fergus Falls, MN, for Respondent.

Scott R. Simmons, St. Paul, MN, for Amicus Curiae Association of Minnesota Counties.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.


OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

This case arises from the decision of respondent Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment (Board) to deny an application for an area variance sought by appellants Cyril and Cynara Stadsvold under the County's Shoreland Management Ordinance. On appeal to the district court, the Board's denial of the variance was affirmed. On appeal to the court of appeals, the district court's decision was affirmed. We granted the Stadsvolds' petition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases