Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Supreme Court did not err in declining to dismiss the proceeding on the ground that it was barred by the applicable statute of limitations pursuant to CPLR 217. The applicable four-month period was properly measured from the time of the appellant's determination of the petitioners' application dated October 19, 2006 to
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.