TINSLEY v. BAH


50 A.D.3d 1019 (2008)

857 N.Y.S.2d 179

FRANK C. TINSLEY, Respondent, v. MAMADOU S. BAH et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided April 22, 2008.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The defendants Mamadou S. Bah and Adam Chilicki, although separately moving for summary judgment, relied on the same submissions in their attempts to meet their initial prima facie burdens. Their respective motion papers did not adequately address the plaintiff's claim, clearly set forth in his bill of particulars, that he sustained a medically-determined injury or impairment of a nonpermanent nature which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases