SCOTT v. FOODARAMA SUPERMARKETS


942 A.2d 107 (2008)

398 N.J. Super. 441

Dale SCOTT, Petitioner-Respondent, v. FOODARAMA SUPERMARKETS, Respondent-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 27, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Williams, Jr., Morristown, argued the cause for appellant (McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, attorneys; Michael J. Marone, of counsel; Mr. Williams, on the brief).

Michael D. Kirby, Toms River, argued the cause for respondent (Rosenberg, Kirby, Cahill & Stankowitz, attorneys; Derek L. Richardson, on the brief).

Before Judges COLLESTER, C.S. FISHER and C.L. MINIMAN.


The opinion of the court is delivered by

MINIMAN, J.A.D.

Foodarama Supermarkets (Foodarama) appeals from an order requiring it to pay temporary disability and medical benefits to its employee, petitioner Dale Scott, based on a finding of a work-related accident. We reverse.

Scott is one of ten salaried, undercover loss-prevention officers for Foodarama. He and the other officers are required to work at least...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases