Although the Supreme Court failed to set forth "the findings of fact and conclusions of law" upon which its risk assessment determination was made, as required by Correction Law § 168-n (3), this Court may make its own findings of fact and conclusions of law, where, as here, the record is sufficient to do so (see People v Forney,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. PARDO JR.
50 A.D.3d 992 (2008)
854 N.Y.S.2d 899
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NELSON PARDO, JR., Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 22, 2008.
Decided April 22, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.