1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 70 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 70 Cal.Rptr.3d 29 (2007)
 

PERRILLO v. PICCO & PRESLEY

No. B182561.

70 Cal.Rptr.3d 29 (2007)

157 Cal.App.4th 914

Richard J. PERRILLO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PICCO & PRESLEY et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One.

December 6, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cassinat Law Corporation, John E. Cassinat, Elk Grove; Lopez, Hodes, Restaino, Milman & Skikos and Mark G. Crawford, San Francisco, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Breidenbach, Huchting & Hamblet, Eugene J. Egan, Los Angeles; Greines, Martin, Stein. & Richland, Kent L. Richland, Laura Boudreau and Jeffrey E. Raskin, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Appellants Picco & Presley, Gregory Picco and Margaret Presley.

Carroll, Kelly, Trotter, Franzen & McKenna, Richard D. Carroll and David P. Pruett, Long Beach, for Defendant and Appellant Joseph J. Iacopino.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

MALLANO, Acting P.J.

Employees who are injured in the course of employment are typically barred by the exclusive remedy doctrine from suing their employer for the injury and are limited to workers' compensation. (Lab. Code, §§ 3600, subd. (a), 3602; section references are to the Labor Code unless otherwise indicated.) The employees may, however, bring a civil suit against any person...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases