1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.3d
  4. 17 Misc.3d
  5. 17 Misc.3d 972 (2007)
 

MINTZ & GOLD v. ZIMMERMAN

17 Misc.3d 972 (2007)

848 N.Y.S.2d 814

MINTZ & GOLD LLP, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL ZIMMERMAN et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, New York County.

September 10, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven Cohn, P.C., Carle Place, defendant pro se, and for Daniel Zimmerman, defendant.

Dean Evan Hart, defendant pro se.

Barry A. Lax, New York City, for plaintiff.

OPINION OF THE COURT

EMILY JANE GOODMAN, J.

Where an attorney, in the course of representing his or her client, advances legal arguments without merit, the well known possibility of sanctions looms. However, attorneys should also take heed of Civil Rights Law § 70, a lesser known, but potential, alternative to sanctions in cases such as this one.

Defendants Daniel Zimmerman and Steven Cohn, P.C. (together Z&C) move, pursuant to CPLR 3211...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases