PEOPLE v. McKISSICK


36 A.D.3d 941 (2007)

828 N.Y.S.2d 566

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARCUS McKISSICK, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided January 30, 2007.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the prosecutor made improper comments during summation is without merit inasmuch as the challenged remarks were fair comment on the evidence, permissible rhetorical remarks, or appropriate responses to the defense counsel's summation (see People v Simon, 34 A.D.3d 852 [2006]; People v Garner, 27 A.D.3d 764 [2006...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases