Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the hearing court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony. With regard to the lineup conducted on February 25, 2000, upon our examination of the lineup photograph, we agree with the hearing court that this lineup was not unduly suggestive (see People v Chipp,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.