1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 9 N.Y.3d
  5. 9 N.Y.3d 949 (2007)
 

GML, INC. v. CINQUE & CINQUE, P.C.

9 N.Y.3d 949 (2007)

877 N.E.2d 649

846 N.Y.S.2d 599

GML, INC., et al., Appellants, v. CINQUE & CINQUE, P.C., et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 23, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel E. Kramer, New York City, for appellants.

Cinque & Cinque, P.C., New York City (James P. Cinque of counsel), respondents pro se.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur in memorandum.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary.

Tennessee plaintiffs commenced this legal malpractice action against New York defendants, in which they assert that the Tennessee statute of limitations applies (see CPLR 202). Invoking Tennessee law, plaintiffs further assert that their claim should be tolled because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases