CINTAS CORP. v. N.L.R.B.

Nos. 05-1305, 05-1340.

482 F.3d 463 (2007)

CINTAS CORPORATION, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent UNITE HERE, Intervenor for Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided March 16, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel H. Kaplan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Brian M. Stolzenbach.

Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Ronald Meisburg, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Meredith L. Jason, Attorney.

Brent Garren argued the cause for intervenor Unite Here in support of respondent. With him on the brief was Ira J. Katz.

Before: HENDERSON, TATEL and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.


Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH.

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.

GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge.

This case involves an allegation that the confidentiality rule of petitioner Cintas Corporation ("Cintas" or "the Company") violated provisions of the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA" or "the Act") that protect employees' right to discuss the terms and conditions of their employment with others. The National Labor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases