1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 64 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 64 Cal.Rptr.3d 867 (2007)
 

FREEMAN v. SCHACK

No. D048583.

64 Cal.Rptr.3d 867 (2007)

154 Cal.App.4th 719

Arleen FREEMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Alexander SCHACK, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division One.

August 27, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry & Associates and David Barry, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Law Offices of Anthony A. Ferrigno, Anthony A. Ferrigno; and Alexander M. Schack, for Defendant and Respondent.

O'ROURKE, J.

Plaintiffs Arleen Freeman and James Alexander appeal from a judgment entered after the trial court granted defendant Alexander Schack's special motion to strike their complaint under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16.1 Plaintiffs sued Schack for breach of contract, professional negligence and breach of fiduciary duty based on allegations that he had entered into a contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases