Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Since the case against the defendant consisted of both direct and circumstantial evidence, the defendant was not entitled to a charge that his guilt must be proven to a moral certainty, rather than beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Daddona,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.