1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 650 S.E.2d
  5. 650 S.E.2d 272 (2007)
 

MATEEN v. DICUS

No. A05A1372.

650 S.E.2d 272 (2007)

MATEEN et al. v. DICUS.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Reconsideration Denied July 25, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Suraiya A. Mateen, pro se.

Roohi F. Faiyaz, pro se.

Reema Mohammedi, pro se.

Weinstock & Scavo, Richard J. Capriola, Sharon M. Lewonski, Atlanta, for appellee.

MIKELL, Judge.

In Mateen v. Dicus,1 the Supreme Court reversed Division 1 of our opinion in this case,2 holding that we erred in concluding that we lacked jurisdiction to consider two enumerations of error because appellants Suraiya A. Mateen, Roohi Fatima Faiyaz, and Reema Mohammedi failed to include the relevant orders in their notice of appeal. Accordingly, our prior judgment as to Division 1 is vacated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases