1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 470 F.Supp.2d
  5. 470 F.Supp.2d 448 (2007)
 

ROCEP LUSOL HOLDINGS LTD. v. PERMATEX, INC.

No. CIV.A. 05-141-KAJ.

470 F.Supp.2d 448 (2007)

ROCEP LUSOL HOLDINGS LIMITED, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. PERMATEX, INC., and Ultramotive Corporation, Defendants/Counterclaimants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

January 19, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David P. Primack, Esq., Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Wilmington, DE, for Plaintiff. Of Counsel: Robert E. Cannuscio, Esq., Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Philadelphia, PA.

John G. Harris, Esq., Reed Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE, for Defendants. Of Counsel: Lloyd McAulay, Esq., Stephen Chin, Esq., Reed Smith LLP, New York City.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KENT A. JORDAN, Circuit Judge.1

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a patent infringement case. Plaintiff Rocep Lusol Holdings Limited ("Rocep") alleges that Defendants, Permatex, Inc. and Ultramotive Corporation (collectively, "Defendants"), infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,685,064 (issued Feb. 3, 2004) (the "`064 patent"). (Docket Item ["D.I."] 1 at ¶¶ 11, 13.) Before me are the parties' requests...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases