CINDRICH v. FISHER

Civil Action No. 05-1348.

512 F.Supp.2d 396 (2007)

Rita J. CINDRICH, Plaintiff, v. Michael FISHER, in his former capacity as Attorney General and individually, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

May 31, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick Sorek, Leech, Tishman, Fuscaldo & Lampl, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff.

Daniel J. Doyle, Office of the Attorney General, Harrisburg, PA, for Defendants.


OPINION and ORDER OF COURT

DONETTA W. AMBROSE, Chief Judge.

SYNOPSIS

Defendants have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (Docket No. 10). Defendants move for summary judgment as to: 1) Count One because Plaintiff was not a whistleblower under Pennsylvania law and because no actions were taken against her because of any whistleblowing activity; 2) Counts Two and Three because: a) Plaintiffs speech was not protected by the First Amendment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases