1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 734 N.W.2d
  5. 734 N.W.2d 169 (2007)
 

TANG v. C.A.R.S. PROTECTION PLUS, INC.

No. 2006AP1540.

734 N.W.2d 169 (2007)

2007 WI App 134

Thomas TANG, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. C.A.R.S. PROTECTION PLUS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed April 3, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of William E. Hughes, Jennifer J. Kopp and Theresa E. Essig of Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek, S.C., of Milwaukee.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Mitchell J. Barrock of Barrock & Barrock of Brookfield.

Before WEDEMEYER, P.J., CURLEY and KESSLER, JJ.

¶ 1 CURLEY, J.

C.A.R.S. Protection Plus, Inc. (CARS) appeals from the judgment entered in favor of Thomas Tang, determining that CARS breached its contract with Tang and awarding Tang attorney's fees under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (Magnuson-Moss Act or the act). CARS contends that the trial court erred in concluding that it breached the contract because the trial court's factual findings regarding Tang's and O'Reilly Motors's (O'Reilly) communications with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases