1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 38 A.D.3d
  5. 38 A.D.3d 859 (2007)
 

MICHAEL STACHNIK ENTERPRISES, INC. v. HEREFORD DEVELOPMENT CORP.

38 A.D.3d 859 (2007)

831 N.Y.S.2d 340

MICHAEL STACHNIK ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant, v. HEREFORD DEVELOPMENT CORP. et al., Defendants, and CAROLYN S. PARALATO et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided March 27, 2007.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The new facts presented by the plaintiff on its motion for leave to renew were insufficient to change the outcome of the court's prior determination denying the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (see CPLR 2221 [e]; Mountains Realty Corp. v Gelbelman, 29 A.D.3d 874, 875 [2006]; Lawson v Aspen Ford, Inc., 15 A.D.3d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases