1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 241 S.W.3d
  5. 241 S.W.3d 655 (2007)
 

COVERT v. WILLIAMSON CENT. APPRAISAL DIST.

No. 03-06-00218-CV.

241 S.W.3d 655 (2007)

Rox COVERT, Duke Covert and Danay Covert, Appellants v. WILLIAMSON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.

November 30, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Hugin, James Popp, Popp, Gray & Hutcheson, LLP, Austin, for Appellants.

Sandra M. Griffin, Robert A. Mott, Joseph T. Longoria, Perdue Brandon Fielder Collins & Mott, LLP, Austin, for Appellee.

Before Chief Justice LAW, Justices PURYEAR and HENSON.

OPINION

DIANE HENSON, Justice.

In this appeal, we decide whether a taxpayer is entitled under section 42.26 of the tax code to challenge only the land component of an ad valorem property tax appraisal of improved land, without claiming that the total appraised value of the property is unequal. See Tex. Tax Code Ann. § 42.26(a)(3) (West Supp.2007).1 Appellants Rox Covert, Duke Covert and Danay Covert sued Williamson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases