1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 59 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 59 Cal.Rptr.3d 30 (2007)
 

FIORENTINO v. CITY OF FRESNO

No. F050578.

59 Cal.Rptr.3d 30 (2007)

150 Cal.App.4th 596

Carol FIORENTINO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF FRESNO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeal of California, Fifth District.

As Modified May 4, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Griswold, LaSalle, Cobb, Dowd & Gin, Raymond L. Carlson, Hanford, and Kristine M. Howe for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Hatch & Parent, Lisabeth D. Rothman and Robert J. Saperstein, Santa Barbara, for Defendants and Respondents.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

OPINION

DAWSON, J.

Appellants contend that the superior court committed reversible error when it dismissed their petition for a writ of mandate to enforce the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)1 and subsequently denied them relief from the dismissal under Code of Civil Procedure section 473.

We conclude that the superior court correctly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases