Ordered that the order is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, since the defendant was fewer than three years from parole eligibility, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion to be resentenced pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005, (L 2005, ch 643; see People v
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.