1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 166 P.3d
  5. 166 P.3d 720 (2007)
 

STATE v. PITTMAN

No. 55682-7-I.

166 P.3d 720 (2007)

134 Wash.App. 376

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Paul Michael PITTMAN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

Reconsideration Denied August 21, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nielsen Broman Koch PLLC, Attorney at Law, Dana M. Lind, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, Paul Michael Pittman (Appearing Pro Se), Everett, WA, for Appellant.

Constance Mary Crawley, Prosecutors Office, Craig Scott Matheson, Attorney at Law, Everett, WA, for Respondent.

AGID, BAKER and ELLINGTON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1 A jury convicted Paul Pittman of attempted residential burglary. He appeals, arguing the jury instructions were based on an incorrect definition of attempted residential burglary and his counsel was ineffective because he did not request lesser included offense instructions. The jury instructions as a whole, including the "to convict" instruction, adequately informed the jury of the applicable law. But...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases