1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 727 N.W.2d
  5. 727 N.W.2d 153 (2007)
 

LONGBEHN v. SCHOENROCK

No. A06-1021.

727 N.W.2d 153 (2007)

Patrick LONGBEHN, Appellant, v. Robin SCHOENROCK, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 6, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas M. Skare, Cloquet, MN, for appellant.

James W. Balmer, Falsani, Balmer, Peterson, Quinn & Beyer, Duluth, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by MINGE, Presiding Judge; SHUMAKER, Judge; and HUDSON, Judge.

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

A jury found that respondent Robin Schoenrock defamed appellant Patrick Longbehn, but the district court entered judgment as a matter of law in favor of respondent. Appellant argues that the district court erred by concluding that (1) respondent's statement referring to appellant as "Pat the Pedophile" was not defamatory per se; (2) the evidence was insufficient to establish a causal link between

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases