SALAZAR v. INTERLAND, INC.

No. B189889.

62 Cal.Rptr.3d 24 (2007)

152 Cal.App.4th 1031

Vincent SALAZAR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. INTERLAND, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two.

June 26, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of James Aaron Pilaster, Martin R. Berman and James Aaron Pflaster, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Jones Day, Brian A. Sun, John S. Sasaki, Los Angeles; Wargo & French, Joseph D. Wargo (Pro Hac Vice), Michael S. French (Pro Hac Vice); Graves Law Office and Phillip J. Graves for Defendants and Respondents.


DOI TODD, J.

We affirm summary judgment in favor of respondents on appellant Vincent Salazar's claim for commissions on the transfer of Internet and Web-hosting services to respondents from AT & T Corporation. The trial court correctly found that the transaction was the sale of a business opportunity and that under Business and Professions Code section 10131, subdivision (a), Salazar was' required to be licensed as a broker in order to recover commissions for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases