1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 55 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 55 Cal.Rptr.3d 800 (2007)
 

LEVITZ v. THE WARLOCKS

No. B186707.

55 Cal.Rptr.3d 800 (2007)

148 Cal.App.4th 531

Jeff LEVITZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THE WARLOCKS et al, Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Eight.

March 12, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Freund & Brackey, Craig A. Huber and Derek S. Lemkin, Beverly Hills, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Lisa M. Bassis, for Defendants and Respondents.

RUBIN, ACTING P.J.

California Rules of Court, rule 225(c) (since renumbered to Rules of Court, rule 3.1385) provides that when parties settle an entire case, the plaintiff must either (1) notify the court of the settlement and file a motion to dismiss the action, or (2) show good cause why the case should not be dismissed. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 225(c):)1 Jeff Levitz appeals from the court's involuntary dismissal of his complaint Under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases