Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint alleging legal malpractice. The plaintiff's underlying action was commenced to enforce an alleged oral contract between himself and his sister and brother-in-law to convey certain real property from them to him. By order dated September 30, 2004, the Supreme Court found that the plaintiff's actions in connection with the acquisition and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.