1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 55 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 55 Cal.Rptr.3d 777 (2007)
 

KOURI v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE

No. B189876.

55 Cal.Rptr.3d 777 (2007)

148 Cal.App.4th 460

Paul KOURI et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF the STATE of California for the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent. BDO Seidman, LLP, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Eight.

March 8, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Randall David Smith, Randall David Smith; Law Offices of John N. Frye and John N. Frye, for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

White & Case, Travers D. Wood, Matthew P. Lewis and Mark E. Gustafson for Real Party in Interest.

RUBIN, J.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Wincom was a privately held start-up wireless telecommunications company hoping to develop an interactive television business. Under its business plan, Wincom intended to execute a reverse merger with Struthers Industries, Inc., a publicly traded company. The two companies envisioned Wincom emerging from the merger in control of the new entity, which would be a publicly tradeable company.

BDO Seidman is a national...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases