Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the prosecution failed to establish his guilt of robbery in the second degree and assault in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt because the complainant did not sustain a "physical injury" within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (9). However, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.