PEOPLE v. ARROYO


38 A.D.3d 792 (2007)

832 N.Y.S.2d 278

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BLADIMIL ARROYO, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided March 20, 2007.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, any error by defense counsel at the Huntley hearing (see People v Huntley, 15 N.Y.2d 72 [1965]) in waiving arguments regarding the voluntariness of the defendant's statements to the police, was not so "egregious and prejudicial" as to render counsel's performance ineffective, thereby compromising the defendant's right to a fair trial (

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases