KOLUPAR v. WILDE PONTIAC CADILLAC, INC.

No. 2005AP935.

735 N.W.2d 93 (2007)

2007 WI 98

Tammy KOLUPAR, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. WILDE PONTIAC CADILLAC, INC. and Randall Thompson, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided July 12, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Paul M. Erspamer and Lisko & Erspamer, S.C., Waukesha, and oral argument by Paul M. Erspamer.

For the defendants-respondents there was a brief by Kathryn Sawyer Gutenkunst, Brian M. Brejcha, and Cramer, Multhauf & Hammes, LLP, Waukesha, and oral argument by Kathryn Sawyer Gutenkunst.


¶ 1 LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J.

This case is before us on a review of a published opinion of the court of appeals1 affirming a circuit court award of costs to Tammy Kolupar in her action against Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc., and its employee, Randall Thompson, over the sale of a deficient used car. This is the second time this case has been before us to resolve a question relating to the award of fees and costs. In Kolupar v. Wilde...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases