Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
At trial, defense counsel argued that the trial testimony of a detective, who had been the sole witness to testify at the suppression hearing, contradicted his earlier testimony regarding the circumstances of the defendant's arrest, and moved to reopen the suppression hearing on that basis. The Supreme Court properly denied that motion. Any discrepancies in the witness's testimony were minor and did not undermine either the witness...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
