Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the evidence with respect to the convictions of robbery in the second degree and robbery in the third degree was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.