1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 53 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 53 Cal.Rptr.3d 728 (2007)
 

TEMPLE CITY REDEVELOPMENT v. BAYSIDE DRIVE

Nos. B189736, B189737.

53 Cal.Rptr.3d 728 (2007)

TEMPLE CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BAYSIDE DRIVE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One.

January 25, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Christopher Sutton and Christopher Sutton, Pasadena, for Defendant and Appellant.

Hill, Farrer & Burrill and Dean E. Dennis, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

VOGEL, Acting P.J.

Code of Civil Procedure section 1268.610, subdivision (a)(1), provides for an award of litigation expenses to the defendant in an eminent domain action "whenever[t]he proceeding is wholly or partly dismissed for any reason." 1 (Emphasis added.) The question on this appeal is whether "for any reason" means what it says or whether, as the trial court found, it means for any reason except the sequence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases