PARSONS v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INS. CO.

No. 32603.

152 P.3d 614 (2007)

Rena PARSONS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, January 2007 Term.

February 2, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cantrill, Skinner, Sullivan & King, LLP, Boise, for appellant. Clinton O. Casey argued.

Holzer, Edwards & Harrison, Boise, for respondent. Kurt D. Holzer argued.


EISMANN, Justice.

This appeal challenges the reasonableness of the award of attorney fees to an insured pursuant to Idaho Code § 41-1839. The insurer contends that the district court abused its discretion in awarding attorney fees in an amount consistent with the contingent fee agreement rather than in an amount based upon an hourly fee. We affirm the district court.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On or about August 19, 2002, Rena Parsons ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases