COUNTY OF AMADOR v. CITY OF PLYMOUTH

No. C050066.

57 Cal.Rptr.3d 704 (2007)

149 Cal.App.4th 1089

COUNTY OF AMADOR et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF PLYMOUTH et al., Defendants; Ione Band of Miwok Indians, Intervener and Appellant.

Court of Appeal of California, Third District.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing May 10, 2007.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Holland & Knight, Paul C. Workman, Zehava Zevit, Los Angeles, and Amanda J. Monchamp, San Francisco, for Intervener and Appellant.

John F. Hahn, County Counsel, Martha Jeanne Shaver, Assistant County Counsel, and Gregory Gillott, Deputy County Counsel; Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor and James R. Parrinello, Mill Valley, for Plaintiffs and Respondents County of Amador and Amador County Board of Supervisors.

McDonough Holland & Allen, Stacey N. Sheston and Kara K. Ueda, Sacramento, for Plaintiffs and Respondents No Casino in Plymouth, Jon Colburn, and Dueward W. Cranford II.


BLEASE, Acting P.J.

This is an appeal from a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandate invalidating a Municipal Services Agreement (MSA) between the lone Band of Miwok Indians (the Tribe) and the City of Plymouth (the City) on the ground the City entered the agreement without complying with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21000 et seq.)1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases