Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that reversible error took place due to comments made by the prosecutor during cross-examination and summation. While we agree that some of the prosecutor's comments were improper, they constituted harmless error (see People v Crimmins,
The defendant's challenge to the trial court's jury charge regarding burglary in the first degree...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
