1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 171 Ohio
  5. 171 Ohio App.3d 563 (2007)
 

STATE v. MUTTER

No. 21374.

171 Ohio App.3d 563 (2007)

2007-Ohio-1052

The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. MUTTER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Montgomery County.

Decided March 9, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Carley J. Ingram, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

James A. Mutter, pro se.

FAIN, Judge

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, James Mutter, appeals from an order requiring him to relocate his residence so that it is not within 1,000 feet of a school, which is prohibited by R.C. 2950.031. Mutter, who is pro se, argues in his brief merely that the imposition of this requirement is a severe hardship upon him. This argument was not raised in the trial court; therefore, it has been waived and may not now be argued for the first time on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases