Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the hearing court erred in denying that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress his videotaped statement to law enforcement officials because it was made subsequent to his invocation of the right to counsel. While this issue was not raised before the hearing court, the claimed deprivation of that constitutional right may be raised for the first time on appeal (see People v Kinchen,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.