1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 44 A.D.3d
  5. 44 A.D.3d 651 (2007)
 

WHITE v. DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORPORATION

44 A.D.3d 651 (2007)

843 N.Y.S.2d 168

JUDITH WHITE et al., Respondents, v. DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORPORATION et al., Defendants, and WILFREDO CORTEZ et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided October 2, 2007.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In order to vacate their default in answering the complaint, the appellants were required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their failure to serve an answer, and a meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Forward Door of N.Y., Inc. v Forlader, 41 A.D.3d 535 [2007]; Piton v Cribb, 38 A.D.3d 741 [2007]; Fekete v Camp...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases