1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 509 F.Supp.2d
  5. 509 F.Supp.2d 169 (2007)
 

BURKE v. APT FOUNDATION

Civil No. 3:07cv820 (MRK).

509 F.Supp.2d 169 (2007)

Michael Anthony BURKE, Plaintiff, v. APT FOUNDATION et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

September 12, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael A. Burke, Stratford, CT, pro se.

Margaret M. Sheahan, Pullman & Cornley, Bridgeport, CT, for Defendants;

RULING AND ORDER

MARK R. KRAVITZ, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [doc. # 13] and Mr. Burke's Motion to Appoint Counsel [doc. # 5]. In their motion, Defendants argue that Mr. Burke's claims should be dismissed under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim. Having considered the parties'

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases