1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 65 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 65 Cal.Rptr.3d 1 (2007)
 

ESSEX INS. CO. v. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD

No. F051091.

65 Cal.Rptr.3d 1 (2007)

154 Cal.App.4th 696

ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeal of California, Fifth District.

As Modified August 27, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marderosian, Runyon, Cercone, Lehman & Armo, Stephen T. Knudsen and Ovidio Oviedo, Jr., Fresno, for Defendant and Appellant.

Wright, Robinson, Osthimer & Tatum, David V. Rose, Christiane E. Cargill and Vickie V. Grasu, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

HILL, J.

INTRODUCTION

Appellant City of Bakersfield (the City) appeals from a judgment in favor of respondent Essex Insurance Company (Essex) that held that Essex did not owe the City a duty to defend or indemnify it in a related lawsuit, Navarro v. Fulamex I (Super. Ct. Kern County, 2005, No. S-1500-CV-254712) (Navarro). The Navarro lawsuit arose from an automobile accident...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases