1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 495 F.3d
  5. 495 F.3d 169 (2007)
 

CAMBRIDGE TOXICOLOGY GROUP, INC. v. EXNICIOS

Nos. 05-30437, 06-30397.

495 F.3d 169 (2007)

CAMBRIDGE TOXICOLOGY GROUP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. Val EXNICIOS, et al., Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants. Cambridge Toxicology Group, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. Mississippi Litigation Group; et al., Defendants, Mississippi Litigation Group, Defendant-Appellee, Val Exnicios, et al., Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants. Cambridge Toxicology Group, Inc.; The Law Office of Paul C. Miniclier; Paul C. Miniclier, Esq., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. Val Exnicios, et al., Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants. Cambridge Toxicology Group, Inc.; The Law Office of Paul C. Miniclier; Paul C. Miniclier, Esq., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. Mississippi Litigation Group, et al., Defendants, Val Exnicios, et al., Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

August 1, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul C. Miniclier (argued), David Anthony Binegar, Law Office of Paul C. Miniclier, New Orleans, LA, for Cambridge Toxicology Group, Inc.

James M. Garner (argued), Darnell Bludworth, Sher, Garner, Cahill, Richter, Kelin & Hilbert, New Orleans, LA, for Exnicios; Liska, Exnicios & Nungesser; Finney; Gary, Williams, Parenti, Finney, Lewis, McManus, Watson & Sperando; Jones; Smith, Jones & Fawer, LLP; Reich; Reich & Binstock; Schwartz and Miss. Lit. Group.

Val Patrick Exnicios, New Orleans, LA, for Liska, Exnicios & Nungesser.

Donna Sgarella Cummings, Cummings, Cummings & Dudenhefer, New Orleans, LA, for Dudenhefer.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves a contractual dispute between Cambridge Toxicology Group, Inc. ("Cambridge Toxicology") and a group of attorneys. The parties litigated this case before a jury, and now, both Cambridge Toxicology and the defendant attorneys appeal several rulings of the district court on multiple grounds. We affirm the district court's judgments.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases